Wikileaks Conspiracy: Whistleblowers Beware
by SCOTT CREIGHTON
(August 15, 2010) In Part 1 of this essay, "The Genesis of the Whistleblower Honeypot, Wikileaks", we explored one possible motivation behind the CIA and the State Department setting up an international fake whistleblower site like Wikileaks -- damage control.
Since most dissidents understand the MSM and corporate news print media is controlled and therefore untrustworthy these days (and have been for decades), potential whistleblowers would look for an alternative outlet to publish material that would be potentially damaging to the administration's globalist agenda. So why not create one, hype it with carefully staged 'leaked' material, and then let the 'rats' come to them.
One would be almost disappointed if they hadn't come up with an idea like this.
But having an idea that Wikileaks was constructed as a psyops honeypot is one thing, proving it is another. Anything short of a confession from Jullian Assange or his latest IRS tax return prominently featuring paychecks from the Central Intelligence Agency is probably going to simply land me in the "conspiracy theorist of the conspiracy theorists" category.
But I have been there before (over and over and over and over again) so let's have at it and see what we come up with.
Exhibit A: John Young, former advisory board member of Wikileaks
"...a member of the Wikileaks advisory board and the founder of cryptome.org, an online depot for leaked documents, corporate rumours and government conspiracies, left Wikileaks, accusing the group of being a CIA conduit." Wired 2009
I am certainly not the first person to conclude that Wikileaks is nothing more than a CIA operation. John Young came to this conclusion years ago. Young was brought in as Wikileaks was created in order to give them some instant credibility; Young already ran a site called Cryptome which published material the globalists generally didn't want people to read.
According to the Wired article, Young has since 'changed his mind" about Wikileaks, but I don’t really see it that way. In a recent interview on Democracy NOW!, John Young drew Amy Goodman’s attention to the fundraising that Assange is currently running in an effort to build up a 'legal defense fund', some 2 million dollars worth and he does'’t even face charges as of yet.
Wayne Madson of the Wayne Madson Report and various Chinese dissidents came to the conclusion that Wikileaks and Assange were CIA plants years ago.
"There are strong suspicions that Wikileaks is yet another Soros-funded 'false flag' operation on the left side of the political spectrum. WMR has learned that after former Senator Norm Coleman (R-MN) decided to oppose Soros's choice of UN Secretary General Kofi Annan’s deputy Mark Malloch Brown as President of the World Bank, succedding the disgraced Paul Wolfowitz, Soros put the Wikileaks operation into high gear. 'Daniel Schmitt' hacked into Coleman’s supporters list, stealing credit card info, addresses, and publishing the 'take' on Wikileaks. Democrat Al Franken, who was strongly backed by Soros, defeated Coleman in a legally-contested and very close election. Real Democracy Now
The following is an excerpt taken from a 2007 email sent from Wikileaks to John Young describing their intimate connections with globalist institutions including the CIA, World Bank, and the Council on Foreign Relations...
"If fleecing the CIA will assist us, then fleece we will. We have pullbacks from NED, CFR, Freedomhouse and other CIA teats. We have all of pre 2005 afghanistan. Almost all of india fed. Half a dozen foreign ministries. Dozens of political parties and consulates, worldbank, apec, UN sections, trade groups, tibet and fulan dafa associations and… russian phishing mafia who pull data everywhere. Real Democracy Now
It's not clear if each and every member inside Wikileaks would be in on the fraud. Some may actually think that receiving intel from sources like these would be a constructive thing. Hard to say how naive some people are who think they are on the cutting edge of revolution.
Then again, it could simply mean that they are clearly lying even amongst themselves. Either way, all of these seemingly impossible connections for an underground leak publishing house that had just started up seemed a bit odd to Mr. Young, who eventually combined this info with the fact that Wikileaks was mired in abject secrecy, and he came to the only conclusion that would make sense to any rational thinking person; Wikileaks was a Cia/State Department project.
"As reported by Jack Blood, Wikileaks are partners with the Open Society Institute, a George Soros funded operation!
"People such as Wayne Madsen and John Young have already attempted to expose Wikileaks as a front organization. When contacted for this article, John Young, the founder of Cryptome, had this to say:
"The principal deficiency of Wikileaks is its lack of transparency about its operators and funds, characteristics of spies and secret societies up to no good and whose main purpose is to hide from public accountability and conceal corruption and criminality"
Source, Alex Thomas, the Intel Hub
Exhibit B: Subject Matter
Several other reputable researchers have already written extensively about the particulars of the subject matter of the recent Wikileaks "bombshells' and so I won't go too deeply into this matter but rather let them make the case for me...
"Is there anything in these breathless new recitations that we did not already know? For example, the NYT offers a few short vignettes from the leaked documents concerning botched raids and errant missiles that slaughter civilians. But in almost every case, these have already been extensively reported -- in the Times itself and other mainstream venues --in much greater detail, with quotes and evidence from the victims and local eyewitnesses, and not just the self-interested, ass-covering perspective of official occupation reports. And the 'revelation' that occupation forces are killing 'an amazing number of people' who have 'never proven to be a threat' at checkpoints was confirmed months ago by no less than Gen. Stanley McChrystal, the erstwhile commander of the whole shebang.
"Likewise, the entanglement between Pakistani intelligence services and some elements of violent resistance in Afghanistan has been a constant theme of mainstream reportage on the Afghan War since the very beginning -- not to mention a relentless drumbeat of official 'concern' in Washington. It is a rare week indeed when some Washington bigwig is not hinting darkly -- or declaring outright -- that Pakistan needs to 'get with the program' in one way or another.
"...Where then are the 'revelations'? Anyone who has regularly read, well, the New York Times, the Guardian and Der Spiegel could not remotely be surprised by any of the facts (as opposed to the oceans of spin and supposition) buried in this mountain of leakage. These are not the Pentagon Papers or the Downing Street Memos; they do almost nothing to alter the public image of the war, and tell almost nothing that we don’t already know.
"In fact, the overall effect of the multi-part coverage of the documents is to paint a portrait of plucky, put-upon Americans trying their darnedest to get the job done despite the dastardly dealings and gooberish bumblings of the ungrateful little brown wretches we are trying to save from themselves.
"... So you see, if our noble enterprise is failing, it's because the Afghans are idiots, the Pakistanis are backstabbers ... and the Iranians are behind it all, training Taliban fighters, making their bombs and bankrolling the political opposition to America's appointed satrap, Hamid Karzai." Empire Burlesque, Chris Floyd
This is a critical aspect of these 'leaks' that Floyd has touched upon. If you step back for a second, you can see the ham-handed brush strokes of a mediocre PR agent all over them. A propaganda campaign would want the 'leaks' to appear to be earth-shattering revelations, but at the same time, they don’t want to throw the baby out with the bath water nor do they want to miss the opportunity to help support the 'official narrative' of the Global Free Market Wars. It's a fine line to tread which they didn’t do very well.
Daniel Ellsberg was asked to comment on the comparisons being made between the Manning Wikilleaks and his own Pentagon Papers. His responce is quite telling...
"The Pentagon Papers were high-level, top-secret documents on internal estimates, alternatives being debated, presidential directives, and so forth. The Afghanistan documents are lower-level field reports, of the kind that I was reading and writing when I was a foreign-service officer in Vietnam. In fact, I could've written a number of them—they were very like the ones I wrote, with the place names changed. Which confirms what I’ve been saying for some years: that I see this war as Vietnamistan. It’s really in many respects a replay of the stalemate we were in 40 years ago. D. Ellsberg
These documents were not high-level secured top-secret documents in fact they were nothing of the sort. They almost read AS IF they were intended to be leaked in the first place. Instead this seems like a cheap PR campaign parody of the Pentagon Papers written by people who THINK they are smarter than everyone else.
The leaked documents also claim that Osama bin Laden, who was reported dead three years ago by the late Pakistan candidate Benazir Bhutto on BBC, was still alive, conveniently keeping the myth alove for the Obama Administration War on Terror at a point when most US Americans had forgotten the original reason the Bush Administration allegedly invaded Afghanistan to pursue the Saudi Bin Laden for the 9/11 attacks.
… The London Financial Times says Gul’s name appears in about 10 of roughly 180 classified US files that allege Pakistan’s intelligence service supported Afghan militants fighting Nato forces. Gul told the newspaper the US has lost the war in Afghanistan, and that the leak of the documents would help the Obama administration deflect blame by suggesting that Pakistan was responsible. Gul told the paper, “I am a very favourite whipping boy of America. They can’t imagine the Afghans can win wars on their own. It would be an abiding shame that a 74-year-old general living a retired life manipulating the Mujahedeen in Afghanistan results in the defeat of America.”
… As well, in a UPI interview on September 26, 2001, two weeks after the 9/11 attacks, Gul stated, in reply to the question who did Black September 11?, “Mossad and its accomplices. The US spends $40 billion a year on its 11 intelligence agencies. That’s $400 billion in 10 years. Yet the Bush Administration says it was taken by surprise. I don’t believe it. Within 10 minutes of the second twin tower being hit in the World Trade Center CNN said Osama bin Laden had done it. That was a planned piece of disinformation by the real perpetrators…”
Gul is clearly not well liked in Washington. He claims his request for travel visas to the UK and to the USA have repeatedly been denied. Making Gul into the arch enemy would suit some in Washington nicely. F. William Engdahl
So let’s see how this all stacks up…
1. Civilians are killed in Afghanistan (knew that)
2. Drones are killing civilians (knew that)
3. There are U.S. black ops assassination squads killing people (knew that)
4. We are funding both sides of the war (knew that)
5. Pakistan is losing control and might need to be “regime changed” (propaganda)
6. Bin Laden is alive and well in Pakistan (propaganda)
7. Iran is helping the insurgency (propaganda)
8. Afghanistan is fucked because of the cowardly and corrupt Afghanis (propaganda)
9. The State Department has only the best intentions in mind (clearly propaganda)
10. All of this mess was from before the Anointed One’s “Surge” in Afghanistan
So as you can see, the subject matter of the glorified Wikileaks material is a bit PG-13 if you ask me and it certainly seems like it has an after-taste of the Global Free Market War’s corporate sponsors as well.
Exhibit C: Slim Shady and the Snitch Cover
In order for the leaker honeypot trick to work, you must have a couple of things. The first thing is a “proven” track record of leaking sensitive material that gets a lot of attention and thus far, the typical MSM outlets have played along nicely in the fabrication of that illusion so far.
Hell, they even got 3 complicit media organizations to play along right off the bat: the New York Times, the Guardian, and Der Spiegel.
The next thing you need to do is to fabricate a “plausible” narrative explaining how the whistleblower got caught WITHOUT being sold out by the honeypot: ie… SNITCH COVER. This is important because without it, no one would trust the honeypot and all the previous efforts are for naught.
Enter “Slim Shady”.
The Adrian Lamo aspect of this story is possibly the weakest part of the entire thing so much so it’s almost as if they threw it together at the last-minute. Glenn Greenwald has done a remarkable job piecing all of this information together and trying to come up with a coherent understanding of what the “official Manning/Lamo” connection really is. It’s so convoluted, I won’t bother translating Greenwald’s work for you, instead you can read it yourself…
From the start, this whole story was quite strange for numerous reasons…
A definitive understanding of what really happened is virtually impossible to acquire, largely because almost everything that is known comes from a single, extremely untrustworthy source: Lamo himself. Greenwald
Greenwald goes on to explain that at the source of this whole story about Manning, Wikileaks, and Lamo is a guy called Kevin Poulsen with WIRED Magazine.
Poulsen, like Lamo, is a convicted hacker caught by the powers that be then released FOR SOME REASON to work as some kind of “journalist” in the hacking community.
This is typical CIA trademark SOP; catch a guy then “turn” them for use as an asset or a snitch. It’s also important to remember that Wikileaks has its roots from the “hacking” community.
As the story grinds on, apparently on May 20th Poulsen ran some ridiculous story, out of the blue, about Lamo getting his bag full of drugs stolen. All of a sudden, the guy has ” Asperger’s Syndrome, a somewhat fashionable autism diagnosis which many stars in the computer world have also claimed” and it’s this story that supposedly Bradley Manning picks up on and therefore decides to confess everything to Adrian Lamo, on an IM chat log, for no real reason what-so-ever.
It was just over two weeks after writing about Lamo’s Asperger’s, depression and hacking history that Poulsen, along with Kim Zetter, reported that PFC Manning had been detained, after, they said, he had “contacted former hacker Adrian Lamo late last month over instant messenger and e-mail.” Lamo told me that Manning first emailed him on May 20 and, according to highly edited chat logs released by Wired, had his first online chat with Manning on May 21; in other words, Manning first contacted Lamo the very day that Poulsen’s Wired article on Lamo’s involuntary commitment appeared (the Wired article is time-stamped 5:46 p.m. on May 20).
Lamo, however, told me that Manning found him not from the Wired article — which Manning never mentioned reading — but from searching the word “WikiLeaks” on Twitter, which led him to a tweet Lamo had written that included the word “WikiLeaks.” Even if Manning had really found Lamo through a Twitter search for “WikiLeaks,” Lamo could not explain why Manning focused on him, rather than the thousands of other people who have also mentioned the word “WikiLeaks” on Twitter, including countless people who have done so by expressing support for WikiLeaks. Greenwald
Now does anyone here really believe that a guy who just dumped tons of secured State Department communications on Wikileaks is going to confess everything on a non-secured IM chat and emails? Especially when the Dragon Lady is running the State Department and the guy doing the “confessing” is smart enough to know the NSA is sweeping the intertubes just looking for whistleblowers? I don’t think so.
Many of the bizarre aspects of this case, at least as conveyed by Lamo and Wired, are self-evident. Why would a 22-year-old Private in Iraq have unfettered access to 250,000 pages of diplomatic cables so sensitive that they “could do serious damage to national security?” Why would he contact a total stranger, whom he randomly found from a Twitter search, in order to “quickly” confess to acts that he knew could send him to prison for a very long time, perhaps his whole life? And why would he choose to confess over the Internet, in an unsecured, international AOL IM chat, given the obvious ease with which that could be preserved, intercepted or otherwise surveilled? These are the actions of someone either unbelievably reckless or actually eager to be caught. Greenwald
Or these are the actions of a character in a narrative created by rather dull-witted propagandists to explain how Bradley Manning got caught outside from him being either a fabricated story altogether or snitched out by Wikileaks themselves.
Now, as ridiculous as that stupid story got, it began to get even dumber. Apparently Lamo didn’t like being called a “snitch” by the hacker community and therefore losing all his hard-fought ”street cred” and so it seems he got his friends over at WIRED to come up with a different twist to the story, this time painting Lamo as nothing more than a patriotic victim of his circumstances… and introducing the character of Chet Uber and his dreaded “Project Vigilant“.
… that it was Uber who directed Lamo to federal authorities to inform on Manning by using his contacts to put Lamo in touch with the “highest level people in the government” at “three letter agencies”; and, according to a Wired report this morning, it was Uber who strongly pressured Lamo to inform by telling him (falsely) that he’d likely be arrested if he failed to turn over to federal agents everything he received from Manning.
So, while Lamo has repeatedly denied (including in his interview with me) that he ever worked with federal authorities, it turns out that he was a “volunteer analyst” for an entity which collects private Internet data in order to process it and turn it over to the Federal Government. That makes the whole Manning case all the more strange: Manning not only abruptly contacted a disreputable hacker out of the blue and confessed to major crimes over the Interent, but the hacker he arbitrarily chose just happened to be an “analyst” for a group that monitors on a massive scale the private Internet activities of American citizens in order to inform on them to U.S. law enforcement agencies. Greenwald
Now Glenn Greenwald and John Young of Cryptome.com have come to the conclusion that there is something very strange about Project Vigilant; it may just be a flimsy front group operation or just a ragged collection of die-hard neoliberalist fascism fans determined to squeal on anyone and everyone who mentions Che Guevara in public. Who knows.
Here is the Cryptome log on Project Vigilant, you figure it out. It doesn’t matter from my perspective; it’s still a bullshit story tacked onto another bullshit story about how Bradley Manning was snitched out by Adrian Lamo.
And mom always told me, “two wrongs don’t make a right”.
Exhibit D: Wikileaks Not Protected by Swedish Law
In Sweden there is a law, a constitutional amendment no less, that says sources are protected by law and revealing those sources is a punishable offense.
Now Wikileaks isn’t actually located in Sweden or at least, we don’t know if it is. In fact, no one knows where it is. There supposedly are no offices, no files, no desks and chairs of any kind. It could be nowhere or it could be everywhere… it could even be housed in the basement offices at the National Security Agency for all we know.
But their servers are housed in Sweden which means they could easily be shielded under that country’s protections… but guess what? They aren’t. No one at Wikileaks has bothered to fill out the paperwork that would protect them and more importantly… their sources.
Bet ya didn’t know that, did ya?
Rules on source protection are written into the Swedish constitution and effectively block individuals and government agencies from attempting to uncover journalists’ sources. Revealing the identity if sources who wish to remain anonymous is a punishable offence.
But the law only apply to websites or publications that possess a special publishing licence (utgivningsbevis) granting them constitutional protection, and WikiLeaks has not acquired the requisite paperwork, local newspaper Sydsvenskan reports [article in English].
“To my mind, it is too simple to claim that all Wikileaks sources are totally protected in Sweden,” deputy Chancellor of Justice Hๅkan Rustand told the newspaper.
Author and journalist, Anders R Olsson, who specializes in Swedish freedom of expression issues, said he found it strange that WikiLeaks did not appear fully aware of the legal situation. The Local
What happens here is quite interesting actually. Wikileaks has been hosted out of Sweden for 4 years now and they have yet to file this paperwork that would guarantee the protection of their whistleblowers? Does that seem right to you?
It make sense only if you consider that Wikileaks, since they aren’t actually in Sweden, is only responsible themselves IF they were to file this paperwork… meaning that if they were to file it and suddenly someone were to come out and show that Wikileaks actually has been selling out their sources all along, then they (Wikileaks, Assange, ect.) can be prosecuted under Swedish law.
So in this case, as it stands at the moment, Wikileaks’ sources are wide open for disclosure and Wikileaks themselves are completely without legal consequence.
Is it any wonder that the hosting company that puts up Wikileaks for all the world to see has YET to even be contacted by the U.S. authorities about all these “leaks”? Odd that the State Department hasn’t gone after the host site to stop these 'leaks' but Assange himself admits he vetted' the information with the White House prior to putting it up. Deduce from that what you will...
"Viborg, who has a Swedish law degree and has served as a legal advisor to popular filesharing website The Pirate Bay, said PRQ had yet to be contacted by Swedish or US authorities about WikiLeaks’ activities. The Local
Conclusion
The evidence goes on and on an on at least in as much as it presents even more reasons to be leery of this remarkably stupid story.
Manning himself is a bit of an odd twist; an out of the closet homosexual who just happened to want to grow up and be a spy who somehow found himself in possession of hundreds of thousands of State Department secret memos then was able to crack U.S. security encryption, download them on "Lady Gaga" (nice contemporary touch from the all too hip psyops department), ship them off somehow to Wikileaks without being detected, and then confess like a simpering schoolgirl to a guy he never met via an IM chat log.
Bradley Manning's mother is shielded from both the press and the FBI investigations because she is "disabled' in some manner.
Ever heard of the feds or the press giving a crap about that when it comes to national security? Me neither.
Manning has been whisked off, never interviewed by anyone really, and only charged with relatively minor offenses at this point. In fact, Bradley Manning hasn't been charged with giving 260,000 State Department memos to Wikileaks... only 50...
EMMANUEL GOLDSTEIN: Keep in mind, we don't even know if Bradley Manning ever gave 260,000 documents to WikiLeaks. We don't know that.
AMY GOODMAN: Well, he wasn’t charged with that. He's charged with fifty cables.
EMMANUEL GOLDSTEIN: Right, which is a big difference. And fifty cables could be completely innocuous. There could be no information of any worth in there whatsoever. But by saying 260,000, we think that it’s an attack on the country, our defense is in shambles because of this. And that's not the case at all. Democracy NOW!
All while the left and right media and politicos go back and forth between praising Bradley Manning and Assange as the "heroes" of the century or ranting about how they should be waterboarded till they piss themselves... all of course depending on how your voting block base sees the world in general.
All so convenient, all so patently sanitized, and all so obviously contrived from the very beginning.
AMY GOODMAN: We only have fifteen seconds, but why did you adopt the nom de plume or nom de guerre, however you want to put it, Emmanuel Goldstein?
EMMANUEL GOLDSTIEN: Well, it's interesting. Emmanuel Goldstein in George Orwell's 1984 is seen as the enemy of the people, but I should point out that in the end of the book -- I don’t want to spoil it for anybody -- he is actually a fictitious creation of the government. Democracy NOW!
The evidence shows that from the very beginning Wikileaks is and has been a manifestation of the State Department and the CIA.
It's a honeypot designed to sucker potential whistleblowers in, take their info, and then dispose of them or the story in whatever manner they so chose.
Though the jury may still be out on Manning himself, if he was part of this or just set up, but as far as Wikileaks and Julian Assange is concerned, I wouldn't trust them with a lunch order, much less my life, and any person thinking of leaking sensitive material had better come to that understanding and do it fast.
Tomorrow we will address the other options available to people in such positions. There are many with proven track records of success.
So far, the only thing proven about Wikileaks is that you shouldn’t touch them with a ten-foot pole.
And that is all the news fit to print on that subject.
ORIGINALLY PUBLISHED
http://willyloman.wordpress.com/2010/08/15/an-open-letter-to-potential-whistleblowers-wikileaks-may-be-a-state-department-%E2%80%9Choneypot%E2%80%9D-you-have-other-options/
1954 Guatemalan coup d'état
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The 1954 Guatemalan coup d'état was a covert operation organized by the United States Central Intelligence Agency to overthrow Jacobo Árbenz Guzmán, the democratically-elected President of Guatemala.Árbenz's government put forth a number of new policies, such as seizing and expropriating unused, unfarmed land that private corporations set aside long ago and giving the land to peasants. The U.S. intelligence community deemed such plans communist in nature. This led CIA director Allen Dulles to fear that Guatemala would become a "Soviet beachhead in the western hemisphere".[1] Dulles' concern reverberated within the CIA and the Eisenhower administration, in the context of the anti-communist fears of the McCarthyist era.
Árbenz instigated sweeping land reform acts that antagonized the U.S.-based multinational United Fruit Company, which had large stakes in the old order of Guatemala and lobbied various levels of U.S. to take action against Árbenz.[2] Both Dulles and his brother were shareholders of United Fruit Company.[citation needed]
The operation, known by the code name Operation PBSUCCESS, lasted from late 1953 to 1954. The CIA armed and trained an ad-hoc "Liberation Army" of about 400 fighters under the command of a then-exiled Guatemalan army officer, Colonel Carlos Castillo Armas, and used them in conjunction with a complex and largely experimental diplomatic, economic, and propaganda campaign. They even established a Voice of Liberation radio station, actually located across the border in Honduras, which relayed programming originating in Miami, and pretended to be the spontaneous voice of patriots opposed to the elected government. The operation effectively ended the experimental period of representative democracy in Guatemala known as the "Ten Years of Spring", which ended with Árbenz's official resignation.[3]
The operation was preceded by a plan, never fully implemented, as early as 1951, to supply anti-Árbenz forces with weapons, supplies, and funding, Operation PBFORTUNE. Afterwards there was an operation, Operation PBHISTORY, whose objective was to gather and analyze documents from the Árbenz government that would incriminate Árbenz as a Communist puppet.[4]
Franklin Delano Roosevelt, the Brotherhood President of the United States during the Second World War, said that nothing ever happens by accident in politics.If it happens, it is meant to happen. So it is with all the major events that have advanced the Agenda towards the centralization of global power, be they wars,economic collapses, assassinations or ‘scandals’ to remove politicians who are not playing the game.
George Soros: The United States Must Stop Resisting The Orderly Decline Of The Dollar, The Coming Global Currency And The New World Order
PP EDITOR FOREWORD:
I don’t fully agree with the below commentary, as the writer is American, and has this natural ethno-centric attitude toward their dollar, as if it ever was an American institution. He can forget that. The US has allowed itself to be swallowed up by the elite and has allowed the petro dollar to replace their former gold- and silver-based green back since Nixon, and it is their own fault. They are and were complicit.
No doubt they are reaping what they have sowed over the past decennia, when they didn’t blink an eye when their governments, beholden to the international bankers elite–waged war after war on unsuspecting nations all over the world, and also economic war after war, as you can read in the book “Economic Hitman.” Where was their ethos? Where was their compassion? It sure didn’t take, if some grew from their hard hearts at all.
The Americans of today are a sorry species and product of long social engineering of and by the elite, and they only have themselves to blame. They have increasingly abandoned their only defense, that being the “faith of their fathers!” When a nation forgets the God that made them, the Word promises that such a nation will be turned into Hell!”, and we can see that coming true at an enormous rate.
Now that may not be a popular paradigm nowadays, but it is true nevertheless. Also any American Christian maintaining that they are believers and are upholders of that faith, might have to be rebuked sharply, just in order to be able to wake them up out of their heresy of “Christian” Zionism, seeded by the scion Scofield and his backers.
America obviously deserves what it is getting, as it’s going down the drain, and I personally believe that we should help it along. Drop the Dollar, forget America, it is a has-been, and it has become a bad influence on the world, lo these last 70 years or more. It is time to pull the plug! And I guess that is what God is allowing, at the hands of these present directors of the Saga of History, the international bankers who are creating a New World Order to replace America and the West.
Personally, I am getting so weary reading American News, about the ‘Verelendung’ overthere, the fake state terror threats, the ATS groping of their victims, their criminality, the foul mouths of their forumites and blog commenters proceeding from overthere. I can’t stand almost to hear more bad news from that part of the world, and I just wish that it would stop! It gets me down!
Most Americans are people without a vision, without money, without jobs, homes, a sound economy, without morals and without real faith in their former God, Jesus Christ. They are a dandy bad example of Christianity, as they go around murdering millions of people around the globe, or facilitating the murder of those to whom they should have been preaching the good news of the Gospel.I guess Hiroshima and Nagasaki are coming home to roost!
Instead they sit on their fat asses in Texas somewhere at their video consoles steering their predators down over Pakistan shooting innocent civilians like fish in a barrel. Like they sacrificed thousands of Iraqi soldiers on the “highway of death!” And no one over there–hardly–, NO ONE careth for their souls. “They are after all just “Ayrabs and Mooslim Sand niggers, towel heads!” Barf!
I’d say, “Lets put the plug” on the dollar! Let them eat humble pie for a change, and go down their drain, before they infect the whole world with their misery and their lost dream, their violence, their Hollywood filth, and their tainted Zionist propaganda media channels.
As far as Soros and his handlers? They are the directors of this global soap opera, who have forgotten that there is a Big Producer quietly watching over them, Who is allowing all their machinations, but is about to take their monopoly board and smack it together in disgust! And they? They will disappear like a blip on the cosmic screen.
I don’t love Americans? Oh I love them plenty! But let them leave their sinking ship and go somewhere else if they still believe and have faith, that is exactly what their good book is telling them: “Get out of her (Babylon the Whore) my people, that you be not partakers of her sins, and partake of her plagues. For her sins have reached unto heaven, and strong is the Lord God that judges her!” Revelations 18:3.
Forget about Americans waking up! They are dreaming the American Dream turned into a nightmare, and they do not want to wake up. So forget them! Yes! Let’s pull the plug! Crash that dollar! I’m sorry but I can’t stand the sight anymore!
————————————————————————SOURCE
In the video you are about to see, George Soros talks about “the creation of a New World Order”, he discusses the need for a “managed decline” of the U.S. dollar and he talks at length of the global need for a true world currency. So just who is George Soros? Well, he is a billionaire “philanthropist” who came to be known as “the Man Who Broke the Bank of England” when he raked in a staggering one billion dollars during the 1992 “Black Wednesday” currency crisis. These days Soros is most famous for being perhaps the most “politically active” (at least openly) billionaire in the world. His Open Society Institute is in more than 60 countries and it spends approximately $600 million a year promoting the ideals that Soros wants promoted. Soros and his pet organizations have played a key role in quite a few “revolutions” around the globe over the last several decades, but these days the main goal of George Soros is to bring political change to the United States.
So exactly what is it that George Soros is trying to accomplish? Well, in a nutshell, what he wants is a Big Brother-style one world government based on extreme European-style socialism, strict population control and the radical green agenda. It would be a world where the state tightly regulates everything that we do for the greater benefit of the environment and of society as a whole.
However, Soros is not the “mastermind of the New World Order” that some have tried to make him out to be. The truth is that to those in the international banking elite, Soros is considered to be something of a “black sheep” and an “outsider”. Much of what Soros is trying to accomplish lines up with the goals of the international banking elite, but what they don’t like is that Soros won’t stop publicly talking about a global currency and a “New World Order”. Of course the international banking elite very much want a global currency and a “New World Order”, but what they don’t need is a “squeaky wheel” like Soros running around drawing unneeded attention to those goals.
Also, Soros does not seem to understand that both sides of the political spectrum in the United States are deeply influenced by the international banking elite. Sadly, the truth is that the same handful of elitist organizations has dominated the cabinets of every single president that we have had since World War II. If you doubt this, just check out how many members of each presidential administration over the last 40 years have belonged to either the Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission or the Bilderberg Group. If you have never looked into this before, you will be absolutely shocked. No matter what president we elect, it is always the exact same organizations that always dominate their cabinets.
But Soros still seems very much trapped within the left/right paradigm and he seems absolutely obsessed with destroying the Republican Party. For example, Soros spent an insane amount of money attempting to defeat George W. Bush back in 2004. According to the Center for Responsive Politics, George Soros donated $23,581,000 during that election cycle to political organizations that were trying to keep Bush from being reelected.
Soros has also been a tremendous backer of Barack Obama, although lately Soros seems a bit disenchanted with him. Through organizations such as the Center for American Progress and MoveOn.org, Soros is constantly trying to influence the state of American politics.
So what is George Soros thinking about these days? Well, in the video posted below you will see Soros discussing “an orderly decline” of the U.S. dollar, the coming global currency and the importance of the New World Order….
Did you noticed how uncomfortable Soros was when he was saying the term “New World Order”?
The truth is that he knows exactly what that phrase means. He knows that it is a phrase that he probably shouldn’t say and that will get a lot of attention.
But he said it anyway.
Soros also seemed a bit uncomfortable as he discussed “an orderly decline” of the U.S. dollar.
Soros has been saying the the U.S. dollar needs to go down for quite a while now, and he speaks of the coming fall of the dollar as if it is inevitable.
The only thing that Soros seems to fear is that the “managed decline” of the dollar could “get out of hand” and could lead to global financial chaos.
Soros even had the gall to say that having the dollar be the reserve currency of the world is not in our national interest and that a move to a global currency is “a healthy, if painful, adjustment” that we are just going to have to endure for the greater good of the world economy.
But shouldn’t the American people have something to say about all of this?
Perhaps the American people do not want a “managed decline” of the U.S. dollar.
Perhaps the American people do not want any part of a new “global currency”.
Perhaps the American people do not want any part of a “New World Order”.
But to men like George Soros, it doesn’t really matter what “the little people” think. In the world that Soros lives in, those with overwhelming amounts of money and power know what is best for the rest of us, and if “the little people” don’t seem to want to go along initially then public opinion can be bought if you just spend enough money.
The sad truth is that we already live in a global economy. Just go into just about any store across the United States and start picking up products to see where they were made. Very few of the things we buy are still made in the United States.
Today, labor is a global commodity. American workers must now directly compete for jobs with those making slave labor wages in China and India. The fact that millions of U.S. jobs are being offshored and outsourced does not bother advocates of globalism at all because it is supposedly a beneficial thing for the overall global economy.
And most Americans have little to no idea just how much influence international organizations such as the United Nations, the World Bank, the IMF and the WTO have over our daily lives.
The truth is that we already live in a world that has been deeply, deeply integrated. As this continues, at some point it will only seem “natural” for America to agree to a true global currency and full global political integration.
Let us hope that day never arrives. Or at least let us hope that the American people wake up enough to not just go passively into a “New World Order”.
A global economy is bad for America and a global government would be really bad for America.
But perhaps you disagree. Perhaps you believe that integrating our economy, our currency and our government with the rest of the world would be a wonderful thing. If that is the case, please feel free to leave a comment explaining exactly why globalism is such a wonderful thing for all of us….
http://powerpointparadise.com/blog/2010/05/brzezinski-decries-%E2%80%9Cglobal-political-awakening%E2%80%9D-during-cfr-speech/
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/082652de-1fb0-11de-a1df-00144feabdc0.html#axzz1BUjzuLXq
G20 leaders hail crisis fightback
By George Parker, Chris Giles and Edward Luce in LondonPublished: April 2 2009 19:11 | Last updated: April 3 2009 08:11
World leaders on Thursday heralded the G20 summit as the day the world “fought back against the recession” as they put on a show of unity that lifted global markets and mapped out a new future for financial regulation.
Gordon Brown, UK prime minister, host of the summit, said the meeting marked the emergence of a “new world order”, as he unveiled what leaders claimed was a $1,100bn package of measures to tackle the global downturn, including support for lower income countries and a $250bn plan to boost the international money supply.
FreeinTX discusses the recent comments by George Soros (I was WRONG about who said these things, it was Soros, not his buddy Brzezinski) about the need for China to "own the NEW WORLD ORDER" to establish a one world government, a one world leader, a one world Earth religion, and the enslavement of the world's people.
Soros: China Will Lead New World Order
http://www.infowars.com/soros-china-w...
Soros: China Must Be Part Of The New World Order
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TOjckJ...
Soros: China Will Lead New World Order
http://www.infowars.com/soros-china-w...
Soros: China Must Be Part Of The New World Order
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TOjckJ...
http://in2worlds.net/headline-dissection
Dissecting the agendas behind the news headlines
Updated 1/8/11. The Arizona shooter. May compose another one concerning WikiLeaks. Still thinking about it…
Updated 12/8/10. The SpaceX launch….
Updated 8/9/10. Dissecting the horrendous CNN article entitled “Why Obama is not first ‘imposter’ president and won’t be the last.” Translation, ‘Nothing to see here folks, move it along!”
Intro
This is the place where I analyze the ever-growing list of news stories that I come across which strike me as being very obvious in their agendas, and/or attempts to push certain attitudes, beliefs and responses on us, with personal opinion summaries for readers’ consideration. It’s intended to be a sampling, not a comprehensive coverage of every obnoxious news story out there. If that were the case, then I’d have to tend to this write up 24/7 due to the sheer number in existence. :D (The headline dissections themselves start after this introduction.)
Anybody who’s studied up on things realizes what a powerful tool the media is for shaping society’s collective opinions about any subject, as well as helping to steer the direction society is going through its various social engineering agendas. I’ve discussed this in the introduction to my movies section, up called “The Media.” as well as in my write up called The Media. Obivously the media is of interest to me.
News headlines serve multiple purposes besides merely retelling events. (And some of this will be a recap from my “Introduction to the Movies” section):
- Mass reality consensus. In the grand scheme of things, the media, of which involves the news, serves to reinforce to humanity a version of reality as a whole that they want us to believe and engage in. For skeptics and scoffers who have never experienced anything out of the ordinary, they have no reason to doubt the version of reality as portrayed to them by the world around them. So a claim about the news being a tool to shape mass reality consensus would probably seem laughable to them. So be it. But for anybody out there who has experienced things that showed them that there is a “curtain” to look behind, then this will make sense.
- Manipulate public consensus/brainwashing/propaganda. (Closely relates to the first point but affects things in a more focused way.) Tell people something enough times and they’ll start to believe it. Promote and report particular details, while purposely leaving out other details, and you shape public agreement either for or against any subject you want. You can get a nation to go along with supporting a war/invasion, get the public to adore and support sociopathic politicians thinking they’re swell people, convince people of the need to rely on Big Pharma, vaccinations, etc. instead of natural health and healing, convince people who “the enemies” and “allies” are, convince people of their own helpless disempowerment, etc. etc. And with the right word usage and convincing, hypnotic delivery you can get people to disbelieve and doubt something that’s right in front of their face. It’s all in the way things are – or aren’t – reported, along with constant reinforcement of certain ideas, people and images. Brainwashing 101. There are endless ways in which this is applied every day, in thousands of news stories around the world, going back to when the media was invented.
- Social engineering. Program the people with “their” various agendas to shape the direction society is going. (Desensitization, sociopathy, feminism gone awry, pedophilia, apathy/feeling helpless, NWO/alien propaganda and disinfo., etc.) If the news and media – ie, authority – tells people that something is okay, or laughs something off, or portrays something in a fun, nonchalant light, and does it enough times, then eventually the majority will go along with the game plan.
- Provide distraction and diversion. Keep people’s focus away from that which matters the most, so they are rendered ineffective to make changes in the world. Many news stories are nothing but fluffy puff pieces that fill up airtime or fill in the extra space in newspapers, and they do nothing to enlighten or inform. “There’s nothing to see here folks, move it along! Nothing to see!”
Then you have the so-called alternative media, which many newbie truthseekers tend to put all their faith in because it’s supposedly telling the real truth of things that the mainstream media isn’t. (I’ve been down this path, so I don’t say this in a holier-than-thou way.) A big mistake that many newbie or naive truthseekers make is to believe that because some website or news source is “alternative” and saying something different then it automatically means it’s more believable and trustworthy than the real media. X! This definitely isn’t the case. There’s often times just as much nonsense and mis/disinformation to be found in alternative media as there is with mainstream, unfortunately. Neither one is safe and reliable. Don’t make the mistake of the false two-choice dichotomy. The truth is somewhere in the middle, and always use discernment.
Now……Important note: A big part of my commentary/mindset stems from things I’ve talked about all around my site, in articles and in my book, and so the mentality that I describe may be a bit foreign to newbies who’ve never read my previous stuff. Timelines and probable futures, where we put our thoughts and mindset, empowerment, no fear – all things I’ve talked about, and things that will come into play in the following commentaries. So if you’re familiar with my other writings then you’ll understand where I’m coming from, you’ll probably have read some of my various anecdotal experiences that show that this particular mindset has validity. And it’s all just my opinion, as others may feel differently. Just food for thought in case people haven’t considered these points of view.
Stories in order from most recent to oldest….
The Arizona Shooter
My first inclination with this story was to run the other way, only because it’s screaming “orchestrated distraction and diversion for manipulative agendas.” Everybody’s going to be talking and obsessing over this story which makes me want to go in the opposite direction.
Never take anything at face value when it comes to the news, and that would include this. There’s speculation in conspiracy circles about whether or not the shooter, Jared Loughner, was yet another one of the classic “lone gunman mind controlled loners,” which could very well be the case, nothing surprises me anymore, but I’m looking at what the end result of it all will be. Whether he was a programmed pawn, or just a disturbed person acting on his own accord (or the third option of non-physical forces working through somebody, also to serve something else’s agenda…) there can be no doubt that it will all serve several useful purposes. As more details emerge and more articles are generated, it’s starting to crystalize a little more. In particular are some highlights from the above linked Yahoo article. Bolded sentences are my own emphasis:
“The Loughner they met when he was a freshman at Mountain View High School may have been socially awkward, but he was generally happy and fun to be around. The crew smoked marijuana everyday, and when they weren’t going to concerts or watching movies they talked about the meaning of life and dabbled in conspiracy theories.
Mistrust of government was his defining conviction, the friends said. He believed the government was behind 9/11, and worried that governments were maneuvering to create a unified monetary system (“a New World Order currency” one friend said) so that social elites and bureaucrats could control the rest of the world.
On his YouTube page, he listed among his favorite books “Animal Farm” and “Brave New World” — two novels about how authorities control the masses. Other books he listed in the wide-ranging list included “Mein Kampf,” “The Communist Manifesto,” “Peter Pan” and Aesop’s Fables.
Over time, Loughner became increasingly engrossed in his own thoughts — what one of the friends described as a “nihilistic rut.”
Loughner, an ardent atheist, began to characterize people as sheep whose free will was being sapped by the monotony of modern life.
“He didn’t want people to wake up and do the same thing every day. He wanted more chaos, he wanted less regularity,” one friend said.
The friend added that Loughner believed government was trying to get people to accept their meaningless lives so that they would stop dreaming — literally.
He told anyone who would listen that the world we see does not exist, that words have no meaning — and that the only way to derive meaning was during sleep.
Loughner began obsessing about a practice called lucid dreaming, in which people try to actively control their dreams. He kept a detailed journal about what he saw while asleep, and tried to get the friends involved….”Basically you have a kid whose ideas about what’s really happening in this world are a spot on match for thousands of other so-called “conspiracy theorists” and truth seekers around the world. So maybe it’s becoming a little more obvious where this is going now? A pretext for lumping all “conspiracy theorists” or those who dare question authority/the government and/or the mainstream version of events, into the same category. ie, labeling them as “terrorists.” Because this one guy had these beliefs and then went crazy and shot people up, including a nine year old child, guess how that makes everybody else look who also share many of the same beliefs? Even the sane ones who would never shoot people up?
I have no idea what happened with Jared Loughner, whether he was somebody being experimented on with mind control and programmed the way all the other “lone gunman nutters” have been (his YouTube vids and such talk about mind control) or if he was just somebody who let conspiracies and awareness drive him crazy, and disintegrated into disconnected gibberish. (his friends report a drastic downturn with him within only a year, claiming that prior to that he seemed fine.) There are those who can handle these subjects, and there are those who clearly cannot and sink into a downward spiral with it all. And he may very well be a case of the latter. Though again it could be some serious MK at work. We’ll never really know.
On a minor level you also have the polarized political rhetoric, as people mistakenly fall for the “false two choice dichotemy” of liberals vs. conservatives, and all the mud slinging against the Tea Party ideology, which some people are blaming for this attack. And closely related to that you have the link with Sarah Palin. What’s interesting is that Palin was apparently calling for the targeting of Congresswoman Giffords back in June of 2010. So there’s a little bit of heat being directed in Palin’s direction for the role she may have played in fanning some flames and helping to instigate this debacle. That would actually tie into part of what seems to be going on with WikiLeaks. Where the front stage players supposedly start getting exposed or falling out of favor with the public, which leads to the fall of the front stage government in general. A few sources out there in Internet Land have been predicting this very thing for several years now, in fact. But the question is, what is this paving the way for? Many people, New Agers in particular, think that the “dark” is being exposed and taken down in our reality right now and that it’s making way for the light, and the dawn of a new and wonderful reality. Which would be nice if it were the case, no doubt. But I think people may need to start considering the more realistic, and less fluffy possibility that it’s setting the stage for “false saviors” to step in and take over. I may do an entry about WikiLeaks, discussing what I’ve brainstormed with several people recently, dissecting the various agendas and issues with it all. In particular the idea of the orchestrated and planned, timed dismantling of the front stage government in order to make way for “something else.” Whatever that “something else” may be. (another story that would tie into that agenda is the recent revelation in the mainstream media of all things that over 5,000 Pentagon employees supposedly downloaded or purchased kiddie porn. Something you never would have seen in the mainstream news even a couple of years ago. Previously everything was kept hidden. But the agenda is progressing rapidly now, things are moving along, so I think we’re going to be seeing many more stories like that. In fact, I probably don’t even have to do an entry on it now since I pretty much just summed things up. :D )
You could also be looking at a problem-reaction-solution scenario regarding guns/gun control and/or a way to implement more rules and laws in general, or a massive diversionary tactic to steer people’s attention away from something else, etc. But as mentioned earlier, never take anything at face value, remember. Which means I question Palin’s words and motives as well. Who knows what in the frickity frack is going on. Basically I don’t believe in any of this as it’s being presented. To me it’s all games and lies and distractions, which is why my instinct was to turn away from this story when it first emerged.
http://powerpointparadise.com/blog/2011/01/zionist-christian-sarah-palin-called-to-target-gabrielle-giffords-shoot-an-m16/
UPDATED: Zionist “Christian” Tea Party Hijacker Sarah Palin called to target Gabrielle Giffords – “Shoot an M16!” DEFLECTED BY MEDIA
Sarah Palin had Called for Gabrielle Giffords to be targeted – Even says Shoot an M16!
UPDATE: I expected that the Military-Industrial-complex or rather the Bankers-Media-Govt complex would protect their future “homecoming queen” Sarah Palin–the Elite’s Tea Party Lightning rod and most likely incumbent Neo-Con presidential candidate of choice in this scandal–from harm by her own violent rhetorics. Yahoo whines over the bad bad “Twittersphere“, “IS IT FAIR??“YES IT IS! She deserves worse! She is not just a dumb Neocon, she is violent!
This Yahoo “Poor Palin doesn’t deserve this” ‘article doesn’t even mention the exact M16 quote below, and deflects proper condemnation by concentrating on a more innocent “gun sight graphic”! A convenient strawman.
Leave it to the ‘His Masters’ Voice’ Media Complex for protecting their chosen ones, to stay clear from any media scandals and condemnations. But thank God for the blogosphere (Twittersphere) that brings it out. Sadly there aren’t enough blogs to bring it out.
This is major media psychological warfare to protect their darling Tea Party Hijacker, by creating a (gun sights) strawman and halfheartedly shooting at it before the opposition does, thus shifting attention away from her real offensive VIOLENT RHETORIC referring to Gabrielle Giffords, to “Shoot a fully automatic M16” at her! Most poor media-bamboozled Americans are totally at a loss, considering how few of them realise such things.
Also it is unreal how the wounded Giffords has totally eclipsed the real victims, the dead judge and assistants. They are burning candles for the wounded instead of for the real victims. But of course Giffords is also a chosen one, like Palin, as strange as it may seem to most that they control both the right and the left.
———————–END UPDATE—————–
Sarah Palin had Called for Gabrielle Giffords to be targeted – Even says Shoot an M16!
This won’t go over well! It seems Sarah Palin had called for Gabrielle Giffords to be targeted and even used the words “Shoot a fully automatic M16″. I doubt MSM will pick this up.Gabrielle Giffords was shot today at point blank range and amazingly and thankfully is still alive in Tucson Arizona. 6 other people were killed including a 9 year old child and a Federal Judge. Killing those in power is not the way to accomplish anything. It is so sad, lives were taken, including an innocent 9 year old child.
I have no doubt this incident will now cause a further clamp down of the people and our government officials will use it to insulate themselves from those who elected them.
But what is also disturbing is Sarah Palin called for her to be targeted in June 2010. It was obvious in it was an election political piece, but it still called for shooting her with an M16.
Citizen for a legit govt. found this information.
January 9th 2011
On this Sunday edition, Alex covers the shooting of Rep. Gabrielle Giffords and others in Tucson, Arizona, yesterday. Alex talks with former newspaper journalist and New York Times best-selling author Jim Marrs about the shooting. In Crossfire: The Plot That Killed Kennedy, Marrs writes about the CIA's mind-control guinea pigs and MK-ULTRA.
Jared Loughner, the gunman who shot Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords and numerous other victims including a Federal Judge and a nine-year-old girl during a political event in Tucson today, was a US military recruit who was obsessed with mind control, mirroring the circumstances of many other mass shooters in history.
Loughner's You Tube channel contains several rambling text-based videos which discuss his fascination with mind control.
In one of his online rants, Loughner said that he was a "United States Military recruit at MEPS in Phoenix". Reports suggest that he also may have been deployed to Afghanistan at one point.
"The mission of USMEPCOM and the Phoenix MEPS is to process individuals for enlistment or induction into the armed services," states the website of the United States Military Entrance Processing Command.
The fact that Loughner was part of the US military and yet is being characterized as an anti-government conspiracy nutcase by the establishment media is a complete contradiction. Loughner's multitude of viewpoints seem to transcend political classification. Watching his You Tube videos, he is clearly a schizophrenic who is obsessed with mind control and other bizarre leftfield issues of minutia.
Loughner's vulnerable and psychotic profile, combined with his interest in mind control, mirrors other famous assassins such as Mark David Chapman, John Hinckley, as well as Columbine killers Harris & Klebold.
Another paralel can be drawn to Sirhan Sirhan, the accused assassin of Robert Kennedy. Although Sirhan was blamed as the lone individual behind the shooting, forensic evidence that emerged in 2008 confirmed that he did not fire the fatal shot.
As the London Independent reported in 2005, evidence strongly indicates that Sirhan was a Manchurian candidate, a victim of mind control who was set up to be the fall guy for the murder. Sirhan was described by eyewitnesses as being in a trance-like state as he pulled the trigger.
"There was no way Sirhan Sirhan killed Kennedy," said (Sirhan's lawyer Larry) Teeter, who has filed the lawsuit to preserve the pantry for further forensic examination. "He was the fall guy. His job was to get busted while the trigger man walked out. He wasn't consciously involved in any plot. He was a patsy. He was unconscious and unaware of what was happening -- he was the true Manchurian Candidate."
Teeter does not know for certain who hypnotised Sirhan, but, he said: "I know it was done. It was consistent with the US government's programme developed by the CIA and Military Intelligence to enable handlers to get people to commit crimes with no knowledge of what they are doing."
Evans goes further and names the hypnotist as a Dr William Joseph Bryan Jnr. He had worked on a CIA mind-control programme called MKULTRA and claimed to have moonlighted as a technical adviser on The Manchurian Candidate. The hypnosis, says Evans, had been done over three months, a period known as the "white fog" when the Los Angeles police task force later investigating the assassination -- and trying to construct a meticulous timetable of Sirhan's activities up to the shooting -- lost track of him.
Sergeant Bill Jordan, the detective who was Sirhan's first interrogator, told Evans: "We took him back for more than a year with some intensity -- where he'd been, what he'd been doing, who he'd been seeing. But there was this 10- or 12-week gap, like a blanket of white fog we could never penetrate, and which Sirhan himself appeared to have a complete amnesia about."
"He is absolutely innocent. He is not the person who did the shooting. He was out of position and out of range and he couldn't have done it."
Alex also covers other news and takes your calls.
http://profcomp.dynalias.net/heart7/www.heart7.net/operation1.html
OPERATION OPEN EYES
Government insiders reveal How the United States Government
Finds, Chooses and Creates
"Sleepers"
Mind-controlled, programmed zombies, also known as: Manchurian Candidates
An Overview of a Government Mind Control Program
A preset group of our people (from the intelligence community) canvasses the county hospitals and immigration centers in order to find viable candidates. We locate and select people who have no close family or friends. Once they have been selected, they are put under heavy, Level One hypnosis. At this time a clear and definitive pattern of their usefulness is determined by our psychiatrists and field officers. If the candidate possesses a relatively high IQ, he will be filed in a category file, called "call file. "
Levels One and Two
If the tested applicant has more than 120 IQ, a "recall" command and an accompanying "trigger" word will be written into his personality during the Level One hypnosis session. This "trigger" will activate his recall program when we are ready for him. We then systematically do a background search and create a file for future reference.
If there are no relatives, to speak of, the subject will be "recalled" and taken to a location of our choice. Further tests for vulnerability will be conducted at this location. If he passes these tests, he is then brought to Level 2 hypnosis where specific instructions are "written" (placed through hypnotic commands and suggestions) into his personality and he is given diverse small orders.
If the subject, upon release, shows that he has retained the instructions which were "written" into his personality, and if he carries out the small and unimportant work duties which were assigned under Level 2 hypnosis, he will receive a "recall service notice".
The timing of a "recall service notice" depends on how quickly we can determine that the programming which was "written" into the subject’s personality has enabled him to complete his Level 2 work assignments properly. Once this determination has been made, a "recall service notice" will be given to him by a person, or "handler" to whom we have introduced him.
If the subject was not given a "trigger" word, the "handler" will use a quick and powerful form of hypnosis similar to Neural Linguistic Programming. The subject will be told when and where to report. The subject will have no memory of being given these instructions, he will just report on time to the proper location. IF the subject was given a "trigger" word or symbol. He will report to the designated location upon activation of the "trigger".
Level 3
The next step is Level 3 hypnosis, where the subject will become an "overwrite" upon his own personality. An "overwrite" is a new identity or personality. It is similar to having multiple personalities, except the original personality is repressed or hidden under the "overwrite" and will not surface for a set period of time which is determined by the Programmer.
The "overwrite" is not a complete new identity. There is just enough information written into the subject’s personality for us to determine his viability.
In the case of a Field Operative, Level 3 hypnosis is how the operative is prepared for a covert mission which requires a temporary new identity. Just enough information will be written in for the operative’s alias and story to be believable by everyone, including law enforcement officials. In the case of a field operative who will be using this alias for only one occasion, his normal personality is not repressed, it is made recessive, but left alert.
For the field operative who is being prepared for a deadly covert mission, a Level 3 "overwrite" can eliminate all fear and nervousness, and allow him to function under the nose of his enemies without the added stress of being discovered. All operatives have to go to, and through these 3 Levels before they are fielded! Sometimes they go through Level 3 many times.
During Level 3 programming sessions, the new subject is told that anything his "friends", i.e. programmers, ask him to do, is okay, even though it may be against all laws of the land. At Level 3, the subject is also programmed to believe that he must and can do everything his "friends" i.e., programmers ask him to do.
Once Level 3 Programming has been "overlaid" upon the new subject’s own personality, he/she is once again given a "recall service order" and is then discharged. The subject will be monitored to see how well he functions with his new personality. If everything goes well, he will be recalled for further programming.
The higher the IQ of a given subject, the further the programming goes! If the IQ is high enough we will study his abilities and our needs, and determine how the subject can be further used. Once this determination is made, the subject will be brought to "The Farm" or one of our numerous facilities throughout the U.S. and Canada for further and final programming. (Doctors Hospital in Dallas, TX is one of our main centers!)
Level 4
Once at the facility, we will put the subject into Level 4 hypnosis, a place where he no longer differentiates between right and wrong. The subject will be told he is a "Super Human" and all laws are written for other people. The subject’s moral code, respect for the law, and fear of dying is replaced with new "Super Human" feelings.
This is the Level that turns a subject into a "Clear Eyes", i.e., a fully programmed "sleeper" assassin, who can commit crimes as serious as murder, and afterwards have no shame, guilt, or remorse.
The Level 3 Super Human "overwrite" replaces the subject’s own morality and/or religious ethics with a program that makes him believe he is beyond all human laws. If the intent of the programming is to create a programmed assassin who will kill on cue, all morality, fear, and revulsion of bloody body parts must be eliminated. The Super Human "overwrite" eliminates both. The Super Human "overwrite" also gives the subject the feeling of immortality and invincibility.
If he has to perform a particularly suicidal or important assignment we do our job at Stoney Mountain facilities.
At Level 4, diverse programs can be written/or overwritten into the brain. Any command is accepted at this level. At Level 4 you can give the test subject a completely new personality and history. You are able to make him/her believe anything the program requires for the accomplishment of the desired project. In this case, a completely new person is being created, not just a partial personality as is Level 3.
Once the Level 4 programming is complete, the subject will be a different person with no memory of his former life. He will not be an amnesiac, he will have memories. Ones which we gave him. He/she will be relocated to a new state and town and given a new life. Everything to complete the construction of the new person will be provided. Items such as driver's licence, car, bank accounts, passport, credit cards, and birth certificate will be created or supplied by us and will be valid and legal.
The subject will also be provided with all the small things that ordinary people have in their lives, such as photos of his family. His family won’t really exist, but he won’t know this. He will have all the feelings of love, hurt or anger that normal family members feel for each other.
The photos of family and friends will be of deep cover agency personnel. If ever a mission goes "sour" and the news media starts looking for his family, the "agency created family" will be produced for a news conference or an interview. Agency personnel have been well coached and are trained actors and actresses. They will fill their roles perfectly, usually letting the public know that the "Clear Eyes" subject has always had a deeply troubled and violent past. The media will present the "Clear Eyes" as a nut case who went on a tragic and senseless rampage. Within a month, the public will have forgotten the incident.
Completing the new life and home, will be souvenirs from trips the subject has never taken, but yet remembers. There will also be small mementos of a life he has never lived, yet believes he has. Upon the completion of Level 4 Programming, the subject and patient (one and the same) now has an agenda that he believes is his own.
In other words, if the subject is going to be used to infiltrate a patriot group, religious commune, political campaign or environmental movement, the subject will be given all the knowledge and beliefs that are commonly held by people in his targeted group. The subject will believe that his fervently held opinions are his own. He will be believable to other members of the group.
Many politicians and government officials on a world wide level have been given "new agendas" through the use of Level 4 programming. Their own beliefs are replaced with the agenda of the programmers. They are given super human talents such as a photographic memory, and the ability to lie convincingly.
President Clinton is an example of a world leader who has been programmed with this technique. Senator John McCain and Secretary of State Madeline Albright are two other examples of an "agenda overlay" being "overwritten" onto the subjects own personality. In the cases of these people, their own personalities and memories are still present, to a large extant, although childhood and early adolescent memories are sometimes erased when this technique is used.
Once the future government leader is programmed, he will be recalled on a yearly basis and given hypnotic reinforcement of the original programming, or new programming will be "inserted" to modify the original programs. If no new programming is needed, the reinforcement programming can be done on a mass scale. In other words, "programmed sleepers" who are part of a lecture audience or a "think tank retreat", can have their programming "reinforced" through a lecture or film. The rest of the audience, such as wives and children, will notice nothing out of the ordinary.
Upon completion of Level 4, the subject who has been chosen to become a "programmed sleeper assassin" is fully prepared for Level 5.
Level 5
At Level 5, the "trigger" which activates the program is inserted.
At Level 5, very carefully, a code word, sequence of numbers, or a voice imprint is "etched" into the subject’s brain. This is commonly known and referred to as the "trigger" which will activate the subject into action. At this time, the subject will also be implanted with a coded tracking device so that his location will always be known.
Once Level 5 programming is complete, the subject is released to live a very normal and sometimes useful life. The subject will have no memory of being involved with the intelligence community, and will have no memory of the hypnosis sessions.
The "sleeper" who has been given a complete new identity will have no memory of his "former" life, therefore he will never question who he is. The subject will live a normal life as a doctor, an airline pilot, a politician, an eccentric loner, or a movie star until the subject is required to perform the missions for which he was created.
These missions or programs were implanted/written into Level 4 hypnosis. Once the the Level 5, programmed "sleeper" assassin is finished with the programming , he is referred to as a "Clear Eyes". A "Clear Eyes" is a "sleeper assassin" who is capable of being triggered, i.e. activated.
Once a "Clear Eyes" is "triggered", accidently or on purpose, the subject is beyond recall. A Level 5 "Clear Eyes" can only be approached after he carries out his program or operation.
Because of the programming, the subject will not be able to associate with the crime he has just committed. Such a programmed subject is Sirhan Sirhan, the assassin of Robert Kennedy. To this day Sirhan cannot recall anything about shooting Senator Kennedy.
Only psychiatrists trained in our method of sub mental behavior programming, overwrites and overlays, will be able to find any tracks leading to post Level 1 or 2 mind control. In other words, a regular psychiatrist may discover that the subject has been hypnotized in the past, and may even discover the original personality. But a regular psychiatrist will never be able to discover the location in the brain or memory, where Levels 3, 4 and 5 programs are stored.
Without an activation "key", a normal psychiatrist will never uncover the programming unless by accident.
If the programmed subject is told to walk into an armed camp and assassinate an enemy leader, the subject will carry out his program with no regard to his personal welfare, whether he lives or dies, or how he is supposed to escape. In most cases of programmed "Clear Eyes" who commit murders or assassinations, the subject is killed on the spot, either by an innocent bystander who kills only to end the killing, or by an agency operative who is on site to insure nothing goes wrong, in other words, that the subject "self destructs" or is killed.
In some cases the subject is captured and not killed. Due to the type of programming used in "Operation Open Eyes", the subject will not be able to divulge any information. Even if the subject is brutally tortured, he will not be able to remember the actual killing or terrorist act, let alone why he did it. This is because all programming is buried deep within long forgotten childhood memories which were recalled under Level 3 hypnosis. (This is the level where real childhood memories are accidently destroyed in politicians and other officials who have agendas "overwritten" on their own personalities.)
Even under the ‘truth serum" drugs, the subject cannot reveal the truth because his conscious mind has no access to it. Using "Operation Open Eyes", the government can create the perfect assassin, saboteur or terrorist. One who will perform on cue, not be able to remember anything, or self destruct before being captured.
End of Part One
The 4th Branch - Immortal Technique
Uploaded by _BigUpRouya_. - Explore more music videos.
http://musicdb.laadhari.com/Immortal-Technique/4th-Branch/67481-lyrics.html
[Talking]
The new age is upon us
And yet the past refuses to rest in its shallow grave
For those who hide behind the false image of the son of man
shall stand before God!!! It has begun
The beginning of the end
Yeah..
Yeah... yeah, yeah
[Verse 1]
The voice of racism preaching the gospel is devilish
A fake church called the prophet Muhammad a terrorist
Forgetting God is not a religion, but a spiritual bond
And Jesus is the most quoted prophet in the Qu'ran
They bombed innocent people, tryin' to murder Saddam
When you gave him those chemical weapons to go to war with Iran
This is the information that they hold back from Peter Jennings
Cause Condoleeza Rice is just a new age Sally Hemmings
I break it down with critical language and spiritual anguish
The Judas I hang with, the guilt of betraying Christ
You murdered and stole his religion, and painting him white
Translated in psychologically tainted philosophy
Conservative political right wing, ideology
Glued together sloppily, the blasphemy of a nation
Got my back to the wall, cause I'm facin' assassination
Guantanamo Bay, federal incarceration
How could this be, the land of the free, home of the brave?
Indigenous holocaust, and the home of the slaves
Corporate America, dancin' offbeat to the rhythm
You really think this country, never sponsored terrorism?
Human rights violations, we continue the saga
El Savador and the contras in Nicaragua
And on top of that, you still wanna take me to prison
Just cause I won't trade humanity for patriotism
[Hook]
It's like MK-ULTRA, controlling your brain
Suggestive thinking, causing your perspective to change
They wanna rearrange the whole point of view of the ghetto
The fourth branch of the government, want us to settle
A bandana full of glittering, generality
Fighting for freedom and fighting terror, but what's reality?
Read about the history of the place that we live in
And stop letting corporate news tell lies to your children
[Verse 2]
Flow like the blood of Abraham through the Jews and the Arabs
Broken apart like a woman's heart, abused in a marriage
The brink of holy war, bottled up, like a miscarriage
Embedded correspondents don't tell the source of the tension
And they refuse to even mention, European intervention
Or the massacres in Jenin, the innocent screams
U.S. manufactured missles, and M-16's
Weapon contracts and corrupted American dreams
Media censorship, blocking out the video screens
A continent of oil kingdoms, bought for a bargain
Democracy is just a word, when the people are starvin'
The average citizen, made to be, blind to the reason
A desert full of genocide, where the bodies are freezin'
And the world doesn't believe that you fightin' for freedom
Cause you fucked the Middle East, and gave birth to a demon
It's open season with the CIA, bugging my crib
Trapped in a ghetto region like a Palestinian kid
Where nobody gives a fuck whether you die or you live
I'm tryin' to give the truth, and I know the price is my life
But when I'm gone they'll sing a song about Immortal Technique
Who beheaded the President, and the princes and sheiks
You don't give a fuck about us, I can see through your facade
Like a fallen angel standing in the presence of God
Bitch niggaz scared of the truth, when it looks at you hard
[Hook]
It's like MK-ULTRA, controlling your brain
Suggestive thinking, causing your perspective to change
They wanna rearrange the whole point of view in the ghetto
The fourth branch of the government, want us to settle
A bandana full of glittering, generality
Fighting for freedom and fighting terror, but what's reality?
Martial law is coming soon to the hood, to kill you
While you hanging your flag out your project window
[Talking]
Yeah..
The fourth branch of the government AKA the media
Seems to now have a retirement plan for ex-military officials
As if their opinion was at all unbiased
A machine shouldn't speak for men
So shut the fuck up you mindless drone!
And you know it's serious
When these same media outfits are spending millions of dollars on a PR
campaign
To try to convince you they're fair and balanced
When they're some of the most ignorant, and racist people
Giving that type of mentality a safe haven
We act like we share in the spoils of war that they do
We die in wars, we don't get the contracts to make money off 'em
afterwards!
We don't get weapons contracts, nigga!
We don't get cheap labor for our companies, nigga!
We are cheap labor, nigga!
Turn off the news and read, nigga!
Read... read... read...
http://tarpley.net/2011/01/20/wikileaks-cognitive-infiltration-operation/
Tunisian Wikileaks Putsch: CIA Touts Mediterranean Tsunami of Coups; Libya, Egypt, Syria, Algeria, Jordan, Italy All Targeted; US-UK Want New Puppets to Play Against Iran, China, Russia; Obama Retainers Cass Sunstein, Samantha Power, Robert Malley, International Crisis Group Implicated in Destabilizations
Nihilists of The World Unite: Wikileaks Is The "Cognitive Infiltration" Operation Demanded by Cass Sunstein
Webster G. TarpleyTARPLEY.net
January 20, 2011
Awareness is growing around the world that the Wikileaks-Julian Assange theater of the absurd is radically inauthentic – a psyop. Wikileaks and its impaired boss represent a classic form of limited hangout or self-exposure, a kind of lurid striptease in which the front organization releases doctored and pre-selected materials provided by the intelligence agency with the intent of harming, not the CIA, nor the UK, nor the Israelis, but rather such classic CIA enemies’ list figures as Putin, Berlusconi, Karzai, Qaddafi, Rodriguez de Kirchner, etc. In Tunisia, derogatory material about ex-President Ben Ali leaked by Wikileaks has already brought a windfall for Langley in the form of the rare ouster of an entrenched Arab government.
At Foggy Bottom and Langley, a manic fit has been building since the flight of Ben Ali. US imperialist planners now believe they can re-launch their shopworn model of the color revolution, CIA people-power coup, or postmodern putsch against a whole series of countries in the Arab world and far beyond, including Italy. The color revolutions had been looking tarnished lately, as a result of the failure of the Twitter Revolution in Iran back in June 2009. Previously, the Cedars Revolution of 2005 had failed in Lebanon. The Orange Revolution in Ukraine had been rolled back with the ouster of NATO-IMF kleptocrats Yushchenko and Timoshenko. In Georgia, the Roses Revolution was increasingly discredited by the repressive and warmongering regime of fascist madman Saakashvili.
US Seeks to Mobilize a New Generation of Young Nihilists Across the Globe
But now, NSC, State, and CIA believe that the color revolution has a new lease on life, thanks to their estimate that the United States, because of Wikileaks and Assange, has captured the imagination of a new generation of young nihilists across the globe who are described as the post-9/11 generation, estranged from governments and opposition parties, and thus ready to follow Langley’s peroxide Pied Piper.Assange started his intensive deployment phase this year with video of a Class A US war crime in Iraq, which was very graphic but which dealt with an incident which was already widely known. The second document dump focused on Iraq, but now the targeting had shifted to Prime Minister Maliki, and the Iranian asset whom the US by some strange coincidence was trying to oust as leader of Iraq in favor of the US puppet Allawi. With the third document dump, this time involving State Department cables, we found out much derogatory gossip about such classic CIA targets as Russian prime minister Putin, Italian Prime Minister Berlusconi, the Russian-Italian strategic alliance, President Fernandez de Kirchner of Argentina, and President Karzai of Afghanistan, along with jabs at supposed US allies who need to be kept off-balance and dependent, including the Saudi Arabian royal family, French President Sarkozy, and others. Wikileaks thus directs the vast majority of its fire against figures who are part of the CIA’s enemies list.
No Equal Time for CIA Covert Operations
Assange also provides a splendid pretext for draconian censorship and limitations on the freedom of the internet. The totalitarian liberal Senator Feinstein wants to bring back Woodrow Wilson’s infamous Espionage Act of 1917 in honor of Assange. Assange must be seen not as an activist, not as a journalist, and not as an entertainer, but rather as a spook. John Young of Cryptome, according to some reports, has denounced Wikileaks, to which he formerly belonged, as a CIA front. In a December 29 RT interview, Young described the internet as “a very large-scale spying machine.”1 The internet is indeed a vast battlefield, where the intelligence agencies of the US-UK, China, Israel, Russia, and many others clash every hour of the day, with commercial spies, hackers, anarchists, cultists, mercenary trolls, and psychotics all getting into the act as well. Intelligence agencies deliberately feed real and doctored material to various websites, sometimes using their own disgruntled employees as cutouts, conduits, and go-betweens. This means among other things that Bradley Manning cannot be taken at face value, although it is also clear that he like anyone else should not be tortured.Assange is now famous, it might be argued. But the Wall Street controlled media can make anyone famous, from Lady Gaga to Justin Bieber to Snooki, and this is what they have done with Assange. It is wrong to capitulate to the demagogic power of these media by making it appear that there might be some legitimate value to Assange. Up to now, the CIA has been organizing color revolutions using Twitter, Facebook, Youtube, and so forth as vehicles. Now they think they have a cult figure whom they can sell to the youth bulge in the Arab world and other developing countries, where most of the population is under 30. This is an operation which must be exposed.
Most recently, Wikileaks has played a role in the CIA’s new “Jasmine Revolution” in Tunisia by publishing some State Department cables about the sybaritic luxury and lavish lifestyle of the Ben Ali clan, leading to the downfall of that regime. The CIA is now gloating that with the help of Wikileaks it can now topple all the Arab regimes at will, from Mubarak to Qaddafi to Bouteflika, and replace them with new and more pliable puppets eager to clash with Iran, Russia, and China
If Assange ever launches his much-touted doomsday machine against the Bank of America or some other financial institutions, we will be justified in asking that the Securities and Exchange Commission make public the extent of short interest in those stocks by certain hedge funds, especially those controlled by George Soros. And as far as Assange’s attacks on the Vatican are concerned, they fit neatly into four centuries of British intelligence warfare against the Holy See, going back to Guy Fawkes and Lord Robert Cecil’s Gunpowder Plot of 1605 and beyond. Not much new or radical here.
Wikileaks: No Serious Derogatory Information about US, UK, Israel
It is illuminating that none of Assange’s document dumps have revealed any notable scandals involving Great Britain or Israel. No US public figures have had to resign because of anything Wikileaks has done. No major ongoing covert operation or highly placed agent of influence has been blown. After all these months, there are still no US indictments against Assange, even though we know that a US grand jury will readily indict a ham sandwich if the US Attorney demands it. If the CIA had wanted to silence Assange, they could have subjected him to the classic kidnapping aka rendition, meaning that he would have been beaten, drugged, and carted off to wake up in a black site prison in Egypt, Poland, or Guantanamo Bay. Otherwise, the CIA could have had recourse to the usual extralegal wetwork. We must also assume that the new US Cybercommand with its vast resources would have little trouble shutting down the Wikileaks mirror sites, no matter how numerous they might be. The same goes for Anonymous and other flanking organizations of Wikileaks. But these considerations are purely fantastic. Assange emerges today as the pampered darling and golden boy of The New York Times, Der Spiegel. The Guardian, El Pais — in short, of the entire Anglo-American official media Wurlitzer. He reclines today in baronial splendor in the country house of a well-connected retired British officer who should be quizzed by the media about his ties to British intelligence. The radical-chic world, from Bianca Jagger to Michael Moore, is at Assange’s feet.Cass Sunstein Present at the Creation of Wikileaks
Wikileaks was apparently founded in 2006. Originally, the group was programmed to attack China, and its board was heavily larded with fishy Chinese dissidents and “democracy” activists from the orbit of the Soros foundations. Interestingly, the first big publicity breakthrough for Wikileaks in the mainstream US media was provided by an infamous totalitarian liberal today ensconced in the Obama White House – none other than Cass Sunstein. In Sunstein’s op-ed published in the Washington Post of February 24, 2007 under the title “Brave new Wikiworld,” we read: “Wikileaks.org, founded by dissidents in China and other nations, plans to post secret government documents and to protect them from censorship with coded software.” How interesting that Sunstein was present at the creation of the new Wikileaks psywar operation!This is the same Sunstein who today heads Obama’s White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs. In his January 2008 Harvard Law School Working Paper entitled “Conspiracy Theories,” Sunstein infamously demanded that the United States government deploy groups of covert operatives and pseudo-independent agents of influence for the “cognitively infiltration of extremist groups” – meaning organizations, activists and Internet websites who espouse beliefs which Sunstein chooses to classify as “false conspiracy theories.”
Wikileaks = Cass Sunstein’s Program for Cognitive Infiltration In Action
It should be clear that Assange and Wikileaks are precisely the practical realization of Sunstein’s program for “cognitive infiltration” shock troops to counteract and overwhelm any real mass understanding of oligarchical domination in the modern world, and any discussion of what kind of economic policies are needed to secure a recovery from the present world depression.In line with Sunstein’s recipe, Assange is a self-declared enemy of 9/11 truth. As Assange told Belfast Telegraph reporter Matthew Bell last July, “I’m constantly annoyed that people are distracted by false conspiracies such as 9/11, when all around we provide evidence of real conspiracies, for war or mass financial fraud.” In other words, Assange argues that the truth about 9/11 truth is not nearly as radical as the various scandals which Wikileaks claims to expose. But the scandals Assange is offering target mostly the adversaries of the CIA.
Assange must also be seen as a deeply troubled individual and a possible psychopath. He has the ravaged emotional complexion that we might expect from an alumnus of one of the many MK-Ultra operations. He reportedly spent several years in the menticidal Anne Hamilton-Byrne cult (also known as The Family and Santiniketan) near Melbourne, Australia. Here little children were separated from their parents and made to ingest LSD, Anatensol, Diazepam, Haloperidol, Largactil, Mogadon, Serepax, Stelazine, Tegretol, Tofranil, and other potent psychopharmaca. Dozens of children were told that Hamilton-Byrne was their real mother, and had their hair dyed blond. Anne Hamilton-Byrne reportedly regarded blond hair as a sign of racial superiority. Careful observers will have noted that Assange’s hair is sometimes blond, sometimes more brownish, raising the question of whether his grooming practices are a residue of his time with Hamilton-Byrne, whom he says he does not remember. When other kids were getting cookies and milk, was Assange being lobotomized by LSD and other potent psychopharmaca dished up by Hamilton-Byrne? There is evidence pointing in that direction.
With Assange, we thus have the tragic spectacle of the emotionally mutilated product of a CIA (or MI-6) covert operation of 40 years ago, who has now been given a prominent role in a key counter-insurgency ploy of the present time. Will the youth of the world, already burned by their recent fatuous obsession with Obama, be duped again by such an impaired individual?
The Precedent: Pentagon Papers Whitewashed CIA, Blamed Army, Demonized Kennedy
Assange’s revelations mainly involve communications labeled Confidential or Secret, and which in reality would be over-classified if marked Official Use Only. In other words, Assange is in reality a purveyor of low level cable traffic, not of earth-shattering secrets. This reminds us of an earlier CIA limited hangout operation, the one known as the Pentagon Papers. This was a carefully screened selection of historical documents, supplemented by outright forgeries, relating to the Vietnam War and compiled by Morton Halperin and Leslie Gelb, both of whom have gone on to glittering careers in the imperialist foreign policy establishment – Gelb became president of the Council on Foreign Relations, while Halperin serves today as chief political officer of the Soros wolfpack of foundations. The papers were leaked by former RAND Corporation official Daniel Ellsberg, who had been a very bellicose hawk in Vietnam before a suspicious Damascus Road conversion to pacifism, and then published in the US establishment press – similarly to Assange today. There was nothing in the Pentagon papers which a casual reader of LeMonde or Corriere della Sera did not already know. But, as Mort Sahl later said, left liberals have generally had very few heroes, so they battened on to Ellsberg and lionized him – led by Noam Chomsky, Howard Zinn, and some others. (This is a syndrome which we see again today: at the moment when Obama’s treacherous sellout on the Bush tax cuts was providing a final disillusionment for many gullible left libs, Assange arrived on the scene as their new Savior. Not by chance, Ellsberg has now designated Assange as his own reincarnation, and thus surely the new Messiah.)The Pentagon papers had been carefully selected by the CIA itself to cover up CIA war crimes in Vietnam, blaming these on the US Army wherever possible, while also obscuring the CIA’s massive program of drug production and narcotics smuggling. The Pentagon Papers systematically hid the salient political fact of the entire Vietnam era, which is that President John F. Kennedy before he was assassinated was preparing to end the de facto US combat role in that country. Instead, Kennedy was systematically demonized and smeared, emerging as the villain of the piece. Needless to say, the Pentagon papers throw no light whatsoever on the CIA role in the Kennedy assassination – in the same way that Assange’s various document dumps tell us nothing of importance about 9/11, the Rabin assassination, Iran-contra, the 1999 bombing of Serbia, the Kursk incident, the various CIA color revolutions, or many of the other truly big covert operations of the past decades.
The limited hangout is not new; it was described in a secret memorandum by Venetian intelligence chief Paolo Sarpi to the Venetian Senate in 1620 as the art of “saying something good about somebody while pretending to be saying something bad.” That is the common denominator of the CIA’s limited hangout operations from Ellsberg to Philip Agee to Assange, with so many other “former” CIA operatives turned “whistleblowers” along the way.
___________________________
1John Young of Cryptome, “‘Internet a very large-scale spying machine’ – info leaking site co-founder,” RT, 29 December, 2010, at http://rt.com/news/cryptome-classified-secret-wikileaks/
แอสซานจ์เผย “จีน” ศัตรูตัวจริงของวิกิลีกส์
ตอบลบโดย ASTVผู้จัดการออนไลน์ 13 มกราคม 2554 12:07 น.
เอเจนซีส์ - จูเลียน แอสซานจ์ ผู้ก่อตั้งเว็บไซต์วิกิลีกส์ระบุว่า จีนเป็นศัตรูทางเทคนิคตัวฉกาจของเว็บไซต์จอมแฉ เนื่องจากมีระบบป้องกันที่เข้มงวดอย่างยิ่ง บทสัมภาษณ์ซึ่งเผยแพร่วันนี้ (13) ระบุ
วิกิลีกส์ได้สร้างความอับอายและโกรธแค้นแก่กรุงวอชิงตันโดยการ เปิดโปงโทรเลขลับของกระทรวงการต่างประเทศนับแสนฉบับ แต่ล่าสุดผู้ก่อตั้งวิกิลีกส์ออกมาเปิดเผยว่า แท้ที่จริงแล้วศัตรูตัวฉกาจของวิกิลีกส์หาใช่สหรัฐฯ ไม่ แต่เป็น “จีน”
ระบบกรองข้อมูลอินเทอร์เน็ตของจีนซึ่งรู้จักกันในชื่อ “เกรท ไฟร์วอล” ถูกออกแบบมาเพื่อปิดกั้นข้อมูลซึ่งล่อแหลมหรืออาจเป็นอันตรายต่อฐานอำนาจของ รัฐบาลคอมมิวนิสต์ และถือเป็นศัตรูด้านเทคนิคที่ร้ายกาจยิ่งต่อวิกิลีกส์
แม้แต่สื่อสังคมออนไลน์อย่างเฟซบุ๊ก, ยูทิวบ์ และทวิตเตอร์ ก็ถูกกลั่นกรองด้วยระบบป้องกันของจีนเช่นกัน
“จีนมีระบบดักจับข้อมูลที่ซับซ้อนและเข้มงวด ซึ่งสามารถตรวจสอบการอ่านข้อมูลของผู้ใช้อินเทอร์เน็ตทุกคนในจีน รวมไปถึงแหล่งข้อมูลนอกประเทศ” แอสซานจ์ให้สัมภาษณ์กับนิตยสาร นิว สเตตส์แมน ของอังกฤษ
“เราพยายามต่อสู้มาโดยตลอด เพื่อให้มั่นใจว่าข้อมูลของเราจะผ่านระบบป้องกันของจีนได้ และขณะนี้ผู้อ่านชาวจีนก็สามารถเข้าถึงเว็บไซต์ของเราได้หลายช่องทาง”
สหรัฐฯ พยายามตั้งข้อหาอาชญากรรมต่อแอสซานจ์ มาโดยตลอดตั้งแต่วิกิลีกส์เริ่มนำโทรเลขการทูตออกเผยแพร่ โดยวันอังคาร (11) ที่ผ่านมา ศาลสหรัฐฯ เพิ่งมีคำสั่งให้เว็บไซต์ไมโครบล็อกกิง “ทวิตเตอร์” นำข้อมูลบัญชีผู้ใช้ของแอสซานจ์ และแบรดลีย์ แมนนิง รวมไปถึงผู้สนับสนุนวิกิลีกส์ทุกคน ส่งให้แก่ศาล
แอสซานจ์ปฏิเสธว่า ไม่เคยร่วมมือกับ แมนนิง เจ้าหน้าที่วิเคราะห์ข่าวกรองของกองทัพสหรัฐฯ ซึ่งเชื่อกันว่าเป็นผู้เปิดเผยโทรเลขทั้งหมดแก่วิกิลีกส์ และกล่าวหาว่าทางการสหรัฐฯกำลังใช้ แมนนิง เป็นเครื่องมือยัดเยียดความผิดให้กับตน